Knygos.lt nariams
194,66 €
-30%
Įprastai
278,09 €
Unjust Enrichment and Countervailing Obligations
Knygos.lt nariams
194,66 €
-30%
Įprastai
278,09 €
- Išsiųsime per 12–18 d.d.
This book explores the relationship between the English law of unjust enrichment and legal obligations arising from other branches of the law. It examines the question, primarily, by considering how English courts resolve conflicts between restitution claims and countervailing legal entitlements. This is much needed given recent cases such as IEG v Zurich Insurance and Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Azitio Holdings Ltd clearly showing the differing positions taken by English courts on the question. B…
/images/books/14026773/9781509966394.jpg)
- Autorius: Kv Krishnaprasad
- Leidėjas: Hart Publishing
- ISBN-10: 1509966390
- ISBN-13: 9781509966394
- Formatas: 15.6 x 23.4 x 1.3 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Kalba: Anglų
Unjust Enrichment and Countervailing Obligations (el. knyga) (skaityta knyga) | knygos.lt
Atsiliepimai
Aprašymas
This book explores the relationship between the English law of unjust enrichment and legal obligations arising from other branches of the law.
It examines the question, primarily, by considering how English courts resolve conflicts between restitution claims and countervailing legal entitlements. This is much needed given recent cases such as IEG v Zurich Insurance and Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Azitio Holdings Ltd clearly showing the differing positions taken by English courts on the question. By applying insights from the theory of unjust enrichment to Anglo-Australian case law, this study gives a welcome cogent explanation of a complex question.
Knygos.lt nariams
194,66 €
-30%
Įprastai
278,09 €
Išsiųsime per 12–18 d.d.
- Autorius: Kv Krishnaprasad
- Leidėjas: Hart Publishing
- ISBN-10: 1509966390
- ISBN-13: 9781509966394
- Formatas: 15.6 x 23.4 x 1.3 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Kalba: Anglų
This book explores the relationship between the English law of unjust enrichment and legal obligations arising from other branches of the law.
It examines the question, primarily, by considering how English courts resolve conflicts between restitution claims and countervailing legal entitlements. This is much needed given recent cases such as IEG v Zurich Insurance and Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Azitio Holdings Ltd clearly showing the differing positions taken by English courts on the question. By applying insights from the theory of unjust enrichment to Anglo-Australian case law, this study gives a welcome cogent explanation of a complex question.
Atsiliepimai