This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence. It is free to read at Oxford Scholarship Online and offered as a free PDF download from OUP and selected open access locations. There has been little sustained consideration of the ways in which human rights act to safeguard the individual from substantive unfairness or injustice in the imposition of punishment. Human rights might be expected to play a pivotal role at the sentencing stage, regula…
This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence. It is free to read at Oxford Scholarship Online and offered as a free PDF download from OUP and selected open access locations. There has been little sustained consideration of the ways in which human rights act to safeguard the individual from substantive unfairness or injustice in the imposition of punishment. Human rights might be expected to play a pivotal role at the sentencing stage, regulating the process and substance of sentencing, mapping out the state's role, and affording it legitimacy in the imposition of punishment. The traditional view that sentencing theory is best understood as a branch of moral philosophy has obscured the importance of consideration of the special nature of state punishment as mediated by and through law and the significance of human rights principles, notably legality, proportionality, equality, and judicial responsibility for the determination of the sentence. Sarah J Summers focusses on sentencing practices which are widespread across Europe and indeed further afield and their compatibility with constitutional or human rights principles. Sentencing and Human Rights develops a systematic account of the importance of human rights principles at sentencing stage. Consideration of these principles provides the basis for an examination of the way in which they might be expected to limit important sentencing practices, such as the imposition of aggravated sentences for previous convictions, the treatment of confessions and mandatory minimum sentences. It is not just that punishment follows a multitude of aims but rather that the balance of these aims may, and in the context of lengthy prison sentences almost certainly will, change during the sentence. This examination of the human rights limits on the sentence suggests that it might be necessary to reconsider the way in which state punishment is conceptualised in sentencing theory.
This is an open access title available under the terms of a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International licence. It is free to read at Oxford Scholarship Online and offered as a free PDF download from OUP and selected open access locations. There has been little sustained consideration of the ways in which human rights act to safeguard the individual from substantive unfairness or injustice in the imposition of punishment. Human rights might be expected to play a pivotal role at the sentencing stage, regulating the process and substance of sentencing, mapping out the state's role, and affording it legitimacy in the imposition of punishment. The traditional view that sentencing theory is best understood as a branch of moral philosophy has obscured the importance of consideration of the special nature of state punishment as mediated by and through law and the significance of human rights principles, notably legality, proportionality, equality, and judicial responsibility for the determination of the sentence. Sarah J Summers focusses on sentencing practices which are widespread across Europe and indeed further afield and their compatibility with constitutional or human rights principles. Sentencing and Human Rights develops a systematic account of the importance of human rights principles at sentencing stage. Consideration of these principles provides the basis for an examination of the way in which they might be expected to limit important sentencing practices, such as the imposition of aggravated sentences for previous convictions, the treatment of confessions and mandatory minimum sentences. It is not just that punishment follows a multitude of aims but rather that the balance of these aims may, and in the context of lengthy prison sentences almost certainly will, change during the sentence. This examination of the human rights limits on the sentence suggests that it might be necessary to reconsider the way in which state punishment is conceptualised in sentencing theory.
Atsiliepimai
Atsiliepimų nėra
0 pirkėjai įvertino šią prekę.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
Kainos garantija
Ženkliuku „Kainos garantija” pažymėtoms prekėms Knygos.lt garantuoja geriausią kainą. Jei identiška prekė kitoje internetinėje parduotuvėje kainuoja mažiau - kompensuojame kainų skirtumą. Kainos lyginamos su knygos.lt nurodytų parduotuvių sąrašu prekių kainomis. Knygos.lt įsipareigoja kompensuoti kainų skirtumą pirkėjui, kuris kreipėsi „Kainos garantijos” taisyklėse nurodytomis sąlygomis. Sužinoti daugiau
Elektroninė knyga
22,39 €
DĖMESIO!
Ši knyga pateikiama ACSM formatu. Jis nėra tinkamas įprastoms skaityklėms, kurios palaiko EPUB ar MOBI formato el. knygas.
Svarbu! Nėra galimybės siųstis el. knygų jungiantis iš Jungtinės Karalystės.
Tai knyga, kurią parduoda privatus žmogus. Kai apmokėsite užsakymą, jį per 7 d. išsiųs knygos pardavėjas . Jei to pardavėjas nepadarys laiku, pinigai jums bus grąžinti automatiškai.
Šios knygos būklė nėra įvertinta knygos.lt ekspertų, todėl visa atsakomybė už nurodytą knygos kokybę priklauso pardavėjui.
Perskaityta knyga:
Nenauja knyga, kuri parduodama tiesiai iš knygos.lt sandėlio. Knygos kokybė įvertinta knygos.lt ekspertų.
Tai knyga, kurią parduoda privatus žmogus. Kai apmokėsite užsakymą, jį per 7 d. išsiųs knygos pardavėjas . Jei to pardavėjas nepadarys laiku, pinigai jums bus grąžinti automatiškai.
Šios knygos būklė nėra įvertinta knygos.lt ekspertų, todėl visa atsakomybė už nurodytą knygos kokybę priklauso pardavėjui.
Atsiliepimai