Atsiliepimai
Aprašymas
This research advances the field of international criminal justice by proposing a holistic framework to organize legal pluralism within the emerging four-tiered justice paradigm - domestic, hybrid, regional, and international courts. It shifts the focus from universalism to contextual organizing principles, introducing the "system of justice" concept to better navigate overlapping jurisdictions. The study argues that regionalism is not a threat but a vital asset to international criminal justice, and it calls for a move beyond the ICC's narrow complementarity criteria. By promoting principles like collaboration, deference, and division of labor, it reimagines complementarity through a more inclusive, functional, and cooperative lens.
This research advances the field of international criminal justice by proposing a holistic framework to organize legal pluralism within the emerging four-tiered justice paradigm - domestic, hybrid, regional, and international courts. It shifts the focus from universalism to contextual organizing principles, introducing the "system of justice" concept to better navigate overlapping jurisdictions. The study argues that regionalism is not a threat but a vital asset to international criminal justice, and it calls for a move beyond the ICC's narrow complementarity criteria. By promoting principles like collaboration, deference, and division of labor, it reimagines complementarity through a more inclusive, functional, and cooperative lens.
Atsiliepimai