- Išsiųsime per 10–14 d.d.
/images/books/12528077/9781922602169.jpg)
- Autorius: Robert Filmer
- Leidėjas: Imperium Press
- ISBN-10: 1922602167
- ISBN-13: 9781922602169
- Formatas: 14 x 21.6 x 1.8 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Kalba: Anglų
- Extra -15 % nuolaida šiai knygai su kodu: ENG15
Atsiliepimai
Aprašymas
Robert Filmer is the greatest proponent of the divine right of kings the English-speaking world has ever produced. Writing in defence of the Stuart kings against an increasingly strident parliament, he shows by arguments from reason, history, and scripture that the sovereign is necessarily a king, whether in name or not.
But Filmer's importance is much broader than the question of sovereignty. His patriarchalism shows that legitimacy can only derive from earlier legitimacy and ultimately from the divine, offering a powerful counter-revolutionary philosophical framework with fatal implications for democracy and
constitutionalism. Small wonder that liberals felt it necessary to respond to him, and in the introduction to this volume, it is shown that his most famous critic-John Locke-never successfully refuted him.
EXTRA 15 % nuolaida su kodu: ENG15
Akcija baigiasi už 6d.02:13:10
Nuolaidos kodas galioja perkant nuo 10 €. Nuolaidos nesumuojamos.
- Autorius: Robert Filmer
- Leidėjas: Imperium Press
- ISBN-10: 1922602167
- ISBN-13: 9781922602169
- Formatas: 14 x 21.6 x 1.8 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Kalba: Anglų
Robert Filmer is the greatest proponent of the divine right of kings the English-speaking world has ever produced. Writing in defence of the Stuart kings against an increasingly strident parliament, he shows by arguments from reason, history, and scripture that the sovereign is necessarily a king, whether in name or not.
But Filmer's importance is much broader than the question of sovereignty. His patriarchalism shows that legitimacy can only derive from earlier legitimacy and ultimately from the divine, offering a powerful counter-revolutionary philosophical framework with fatal implications for democracy and
constitutionalism. Small wonder that liberals felt it necessary to respond to him, and in the introduction to this volume, it is shown that his most famous critic-John Locke-never successfully refuted him.
Atsiliepimai