Knygos.lt klubas Knygos.lt nariams
99,04 €
-30%
Įprastai
141,49 €
Islamic Philosophy and the Ethics of Belief
Islamic Philosophy and the Ethics of Belief
Knygos.lt klubas Knygos.lt nariams
99,04 €
-30%
Įprastai
141,49 €
  • Išsiųsime per 12–18 d.d.
In this book the author argues that the Falasifa, the Philosophers of the Islamic Golden Age, are usefully interpreted through the prism of the contemporary, western ethics of belief. He contends that their position amounts to what he calls 'Moderate Evidentialism' - that only for the epistemic elite what one ought to believe is determined by one's evidence. The author makes the case that the Falasifa's position is well argued, ingeniously circumvents issues in the epistemology of testimony, an…

Islamic Philosophy and the Ethics of Belief (el. knyga) (skaityta knyga) | knygos.lt

Atsiliepimai

(3.33 Goodreads įvertinimas)

Aprašymas

In this book the author argues that the Falasifa, the Philosophers of the Islamic Golden Age, are usefully interpreted through the prism of the contemporary, western ethics of belief. He contends that their position amounts to what he calls 'Moderate Evidentialism' - that only for the epistemic elite what one ought to believe is determined by one's evidence. The author makes the case that the Falasifa's position is well argued, ingeniously circumvents issues in the epistemology of testimony, and is well worth taking seriously in the contemporary debate. He reasons that this is especially the case since the position has salutary consequences for how to respond to the sceptic, and for how we are to conceive of extremist belief.

Knygos.lt klubas
Knygos.lt nariams
99,04 €
-30%
Įprastai
141,49 €
Kaina registruotiems pirkėjams
Prisijunkite ir už šią prekę
gausite 1,41 Knygų Eurų!?
Išsiųsime per 12–18 d.d.
Įsigykite dovanų kuponą
Daugiau

In this book the author argues that the Falasifa, the Philosophers of the Islamic Golden Age, are usefully interpreted through the prism of the contemporary, western ethics of belief. He contends that their position amounts to what he calls 'Moderate Evidentialism' - that only for the epistemic elite what one ought to believe is determined by one's evidence. The author makes the case that the Falasifa's position is well argued, ingeniously circumvents issues in the epistemology of testimony, and is well worth taking seriously in the contemporary debate. He reasons that this is especially the case since the position has salutary consequences for how to respond to the sceptic, and for how we are to conceive of extremist belief.

Atsiliepimai

  • Atsiliepimų nėra
0 pirkėjai įvertino šią prekę.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(rodomas nebus)