Knygos.lt nariams
Knygos.lt nariams
- Išsiųsime per 12–18 d.d.
/images/books/13020537/9783110271959.jpg)
- Leidėjas: De Gruyter
- Metai: 2012
- Puslapiai: 708
- ISBN-10: 3110271958
- ISBN-13: 9783110271959
- Formatas: 15.6 x 23.4 x 3.8 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Kalba: Anglų
Homeric Contexts (el. knyga) (skaityta knyga) | knygos.lt
Atsiliepimai
Aprašymas
This volume aims at offering a critical reassessment of the progress made in Homeric research in recent years, focussing on its two main trends, Neonalysis and Oral Theory. Interpreting Homer in the 21st century asks for a holistic approach that allows us to reconsider some of our methodological tools and preconceptions concerning what we call Homeric poetry. The neoanalytical and oral 'booms', which have to a large extent influenced the way we see Homer today, may be re-evaluated if we are willing to endorse a more flexible approach to certain scholarly taboos pertaining to these two schools of interpretation. Song-traditions, formula, performance, multiformity on the one hand, and Motivforschung, Epic Cycle on the other, may not be so incompatible as we often tend to think.
- Leidėjas: De Gruyter
- Metai: 2012
- Puslapiai: 708
- ISBN-10: 3110271958
- ISBN-13: 9783110271959
- Formatas: 15.6 x 23.4 x 3.8 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Kalba: Anglų
This volume aims at offering a critical reassessment of the progress made in Homeric research in recent years, focussing on its two main trends, Neonalysis and Oral Theory. Interpreting Homer in the 21st century asks for a holistic approach that allows us to reconsider some of our methodological tools and preconceptions concerning what we call Homeric poetry. The neoanalytical and oral 'booms', which have to a large extent influenced the way we see Homer today, may be re-evaluated if we are willing to endorse a more flexible approach to certain scholarly taboos pertaining to these two schools of interpretation. Song-traditions, formula, performance, multiformity on the one hand, and Motivforschung, Epic Cycle on the other, may not be so incompatible as we often tend to think.
Atsiliepimai