9,49 €
Lenhard, J: Was Evans-Pritchard a Structural-Functionalist?
Lenhard, J: Was Evans-Pritchard a Structural-Functionalist?
  • Išparduota
Lenhard, J: Was Evans-Pritchard a Structural-Functionalist?
Lenhard, J: Was Evans-Pritchard a Structural-Functionalist?
El. knyga:
9,49 €
Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Pedagogy - Science, Theory, Anthropology, grade: 70, University of Cambridge, language: English, abstract: Was Evans-Pritchard a structural-functionalist? Evans-Pritchard is widely known as a structural-functionalist (Kuper, 1988). What sense does this question make taken by its face-value? Let us understand it as a mathematical exercise. The question asks whether the works of Evans-Pritchard can be described as a subset of the anthropological tradition r…
  • Leidėjas:
  • Metai: 2012
  • Puslapiai: 5
  • ISBN: 9783656323785
  • ISBN-10: 365632378X
  • ISBN-13: 9783656323785
  • Formatas: ePub
  • Kalba: Anglų

Lenhard, J: Was Evans-Pritchard a Structural-Functionalist? (el. knyga) (skaityta knyga) | knygos.lt

Atsiliepimai

(3.00 Goodreads įvertinimas)

Formatai:

9,49 € El. knyga

Aprašymas

Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Pedagogy - Science, Theory, Anthropology, grade: 70, University of Cambridge, language: English, abstract: Was Evans-Pritchard a structural-functionalist? Evans-Pritchard is widely known as a structural-functionalist (Kuper, 1988). What sense does this question make taken by its face-value? Let us understand it as a mathematical exercise. The question asks whether the works of Evans-Pritchard can be described as a subset of the anthropological tradition referred to as structural-functionalism. As I will argue, his works can not - at least in their entirety - both temporally and partially be seen as a subset of structural-functionalism. Especially in his later works, Evans-Pritchard stresses individual agency, the importance of history as well as personality in a way that is not congruent with structural functionalism in its traditional way. But before I am able to assess the congruency of Evans-Pritchard's work with structural-functionalist imperatives in detail, the latter needs to be expressed in a clear set of statutes. The work of Radcliffe-Brown (Radcliffe-Brown, 1940) and Fortes (Fortes, 1953) can serve as a guideline for this.

9,49 €
Prisijunkite ir už šią prekę
gausite
0,09 Knygų Eurų! ?

Elektroninė knyga:
Atsiuntimas po užsakymo akimirksniu! Skirta skaitymui tik kompiuteryje, planšetėje ar kitame elektroniniame įrenginyje.

Mažiausia kaina per 30 dienų: 9,49 €

Mažiausia kaina užfiksuota: Kaina nesikeitė

  • Autorius: Johannes Lenhard
  • Leidėjas:
  • Metai: 2012
  • Puslapiai: 5
  • ISBN: 9783656323785
  • ISBN-10: 365632378X
  • ISBN-13: 9783656323785
  • Formatas: ePub
  • Kalba: Anglų

Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Pedagogy - Science, Theory, Anthropology, grade: 70, University of Cambridge, language: English, abstract: Was Evans-Pritchard a structural-functionalist? Evans-Pritchard is widely known as a structural-functionalist (Kuper, 1988). What sense does this question make taken by its face-value? Let us understand it as a mathematical exercise. The question asks whether the works of Evans-Pritchard can be described as a subset of the anthropological tradition referred to as structural-functionalism. As I will argue, his works can not - at least in their entirety - both temporally and partially be seen as a subset of structural-functionalism. Especially in his later works, Evans-Pritchard stresses individual agency, the importance of history as well as personality in a way that is not congruent with structural functionalism in its traditional way. But before I am able to assess the congruency of Evans-Pritchard's work with structural-functionalist imperatives in detail, the latter needs to be expressed in a clear set of statutes. The work of Radcliffe-Brown (Radcliffe-Brown, 1940) and Fortes (Fortes, 1953) can serve as a guideline for this.

Atsiliepimai

  • Atsiliepimų nėra
0 pirkėjai įvertino šią prekę.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(rodomas nebus)