- Išparduota
/https://libri-media.knygos-static.lt/ff02317e-72e2-4005-b2fb-0f35a49e4c7e/2)
- Leidėjas: Cambridge University Press
- Metai: 2011
- Puslapiai: 624
- ISBN: 9781139119184
- ISBN-10: 1139119184
- ISBN-13: 9781139119184
- Formatas: ACSM ?
- Kalba: Anglų
Judiciaries in Comparative Perspective (el. knyga) (skaityta knyga) | knygos.lt
Atsiliepimai
Formatai:
Aprašymas
An independent and impartial judiciary is fundamental to the existence and operation of a liberal democracy. Focussing on Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States, this comparative 2011 study explores four major issues affecting the judicial institution. These issues relate to the appointment and discipline of judges; judges and freedom of speech; the performance of non-judicial functions by judges; and judicial bias and recusal, and each is set within the context of the importance of maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. The essays highlight important episodes or controversies affecting members of the judiciary to illustrate relevant principles.
Elektroninė knyga:
Atsiuntimas po užsakymo akimirksniu! Skirta skaitymui tik kompiuteryje, planšetėje ar kitame elektroniniame įrenginyje.
Kaip skaityti el. knygas ACSM formatu?
Mažiausia kaina per 30 dienų: 237,69 €
Mažiausia kaina užfiksuota: Kaina nesikeitė
- Leidėjas: Cambridge University Press
- Metai: 2011
- Puslapiai: 624
- ISBN: 9781139119184
- ISBN-10: 1139119184
- ISBN-13: 9781139119184
- Formatas: ACSM ?
- Kalba: Anglų
An independent and impartial judiciary is fundamental to the existence and operation of a liberal democracy. Focussing on Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States, this comparative 2011 study explores four major issues affecting the judicial institution. These issues relate to the appointment and discipline of judges; judges and freedom of speech; the performance of non-judicial functions by judges; and judicial bias and recusal, and each is set within the context of the importance of maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. The essays highlight important episodes or controversies affecting members of the judiciary to illustrate relevant principles.
Atsiliepimai