Atsiliepimai
Formatai:
Aprašymas
With the era of positivistic hostility toward philosophy s past ending, renewed debate has started concerning the relationship between philosophers and their history. The lead question is usually whether philosophy s past "should" matter to present practice, but Scharff argues that it inevitably "does" matter. In Part 1, he shows how history matters even for Socrates, Descartes, and Comte, despite their seemingly ahistorical Platonic, Cartesian, and Positivistic ideals. In Part 2, through interpretations of Dilthey, Nietzsche, and Heidegger, Scharff describes what "having a history" involves today, when the tradition we inherit encourages the idea that having one is optional and surmountable."
Elektroninė knyga:
Atsiuntimas po užsakymo akimirksniu! Skirta skaitymui tik kompiuteryje, planšetėje ar kitame elektroniniame įrenginyje.
Kaip skaityti el. knygas ACSM formatu?
Mažiausia kaina per 30 dienų: 105,49 €
Mažiausia kaina užfiksuota: Kaina nesikeitė
With the era of positivistic hostility toward philosophy s past ending, renewed debate has started concerning the relationship between philosophers and their history. The lead question is usually whether philosophy s past "should" matter to present practice, but Scharff argues that it inevitably "does" matter. In Part 1, he shows how history matters even for Socrates, Descartes, and Comte, despite their seemingly ahistorical Platonic, Cartesian, and Positivistic ideals. In Part 2, through interpretations of Dilthey, Nietzsche, and Heidegger, Scharff describes what "having a history" involves today, when the tradition we inherit encourages the idea that having one is optional and surmountable."
Atsiliepimai