9,29 €
Cato Supreme Court Review
Cato Supreme Court Review
  • Išparduota
Cato Supreme Court Review
Cato Supreme Court Review
El. knyga: 9,29 €
Now in its 19th year, the Cato Supreme Court Review brings together leading legal scholars to analyze key cases from the Court's most recent term, plus cases coming up. Topics in the 2019-2020 edition include DACA and the Dreamers (DHS v. Regents), the president's removal power (Seila Law v. CFPB), Obamacare's so-called contraception mandate (Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania), qualified and absolute immunity (Hernandez v. Mesa), and using state tuition assistance on religious schools…
0
SKAITYTAKNYGA
  • Leidėjas:
  • Metai: 20200917
  • Puslapiai: 300
  • ISBN-10: 1952223121
  • ISBN-13: 9781952223129
  • Formatas: ACSM ?
  • Kalba: Anglų

Cato Supreme Court Review | knygos.lt

Atsiliepimai

Įvertinimų nėra.
Įvertink ir tu! Visi atsiliepimai

Formatai:

9,29 € El. knyga

Aprašymas

Now in its 19th year, the Cato Supreme Court Review brings together leading legal scholars to analyze key cases from the Court's most recent term, plus cases coming up. Topics in the 2019-2020 edition include DACA and the Dreamers (DHS v. Regents), the president's removal power (Seila Law v. CFPB), Obamacare's so-called contraception mandate (Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania), qualified and absolute immunity (Hernandez v. Mesa), and using state tuition assistance on religious schools (Espinoza v. Montana).

  • 9,29 €
Prisijunkite ir už šią prekę
gausite 0,09 Knygų Eurų!?

Elektroninė knyga:
Atsiuntimas po užsakymo akimirksniu! Skirta skaitymui tik kompiuteryje, planšetėje ar kitame elektroniniame įrenginyje.

Kaip skaityti el. knygas ACSM formatu?

Formatai:

9,29 €El. knyga

Now in its 19th year, the Cato Supreme Court Review brings together leading legal scholars to analyze key cases from the Court's most recent term, plus cases coming up. Topics in the 2019-2020 edition include DACA and the Dreamers (DHS v. Regents), the president's removal power (Seila Law v. CFPB), Obamacare's so-called contraception mandate (Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania), qualified and absolute immunity (Hernandez v. Mesa), and using state tuition assistance on religious schools (Espinoza v. Montana).

Atsiliepimai

  • Atsiliepimų nėra
0 pirkėjai įvertino šią prekę.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%